1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 1,908 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Bravo (148 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Bravo (305 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 2012 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Plymouth | Fiat |
| Model | Pronto Cruiser | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1908 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
