1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 434 kg more than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Plymouth | Cadillac |
Model | Pronto Spyder | CTS |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 68 L |