1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder vs. 2012 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 609 kg more than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder has manual transmission. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder | 2012 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Plymouth | SsangYong |
Model | Pronto Spyder | Stavic |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 80 L |