1998 Proton 400 vs. 1955 Rover P4
To start off, 1998 Proton 400 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,102 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 74 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Rover P4 weights approximately 394 kg more than 1998 Proton 400.
Because 1955 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Rover P4 (150 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Proton 400. (108 Nm). This means 1955 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Proton 400 | 1955 Rover P4 | |
Make | Proton | Rover |
Model | 400 | P4 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2102 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 150 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2830 mm |