1998 Proton 400 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1998 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1998 Proton 400.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Proton 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Proton 400 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Proton | Toyota |
| Model | 400 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |
