1998 Proton Satria vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1998 Proton Satria is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Proton Satria is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Proton Satria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Proton Satria | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Proton | Toyota |
| Model | Satria | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1833 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |
