1998 Proton Satria vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Proton Satria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Proton Satria would be higher.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Proton Satria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Proton Satria | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Proton | Fisker |
| Model | Satria | Karma |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3160 mm |
