1998 Renault Clio vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Corona weights approximately 5 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1964 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Corona |
Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |