1998 Renault Clio vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,837 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (88 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Crown weights approximately 290 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Toyota Crown (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Clio | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Clio | Crown |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1837 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |
