1998 Renault Clio vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 268 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1973 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Clio | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Clio | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
