1998 Renault Clio vs. 1979 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 105 kg more than 1979 Mazda 323.
Because 1979 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mazda 323 has automatic transmission and 1998 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1998 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 1979 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Clio | 323 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2320 mm |