1998 Renault Clio vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 360 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 360 (101 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 360 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 360 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 360 (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Clio | 360 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 58 L |