1998 Renault Clio vs. 1986 Ford Tempo

To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (58 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 225 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio. 1986 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 1998 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1998 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: