1998 Renault Clio vs. 1999 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 1999 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Saab 05-Sep (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Saab 05-Sep (240 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1999 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 1999 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Renault | Saab |
Model | Clio | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1998 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1783 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 75 L |