1998 Renault Clio vs. 2001 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2001 Skoda Superb is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Skoda Superb (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Superb should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Skoda Superb weights approximately 316 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Skoda Superb (350 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Skoda Superb will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Clio | 2001 Skoda Superb | |
| Make | Renault | Skoda |
| Model | Clio | Superb |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 62 L |
