1998 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2005 Subaru Forester is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Forester weights approximately 535 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 2005 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Renault | Subaru |
Model | Clio | Forester |
Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |