1998 Renault Clio vs. 2005 TVR Chimaera
To start off, 2005 TVR Chimaera is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 TVR Chimaera weights approximately 280 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 TVR Chimaera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 TVR Chimaera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Clio | 2005 TVR Chimaera | |
| Make | Renault | TVR |
| Model | Clio | Chimaera |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 257 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |
