1998 Renault Clio vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Camry weights approximately 420 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Camry |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |