1998 Renault Clio vs. 2008 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2008 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Tribeca weights approximately 440 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Subaru Tribeca is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Clio | 2008 Subaru Tribeca | |
| Make | Renault | Subaru |
| Model | Clio | Tribeca |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |
