1998 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2009 Hyundai i20 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Hyundai i20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hyundai i20 (99 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai i20 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hyundai i20 (137 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Hyundai i20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Clio | 2009 Hyundai i20 | |
| Make | Renault | Hyundai |
| Model | Clio | i20 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 114 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.8 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 75 mm |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.1 seconds | 11.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 5.6 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
