1998 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Ferrari 599
To start off, 2010 Ferrari 599 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Ferrari 599 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ferrari 599 (611 HP) has 537 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ferrari 599 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ferrari 599 weights approximately 748 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ferrari 599 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ferrari 599. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 2010 Ferrari 599 | |
Make | Renault | Ferrari |
Model | Clio | 599 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 611 HP |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1688 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4666 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1961 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1336 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 105 L |