1998 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Fiat Idea
To start off, 2010 Fiat Idea is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Idea (69 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Idea should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Idea weights approximately 270 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Idea (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Idea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Clio | 2010 Fiat Idea | |
| Make | Renault | Fiat |
| Model | Clio | Idea |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1783 cc | 1246 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 159 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.1 seconds | 15.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |
