1998 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Lada 111
To start off, 2010 Lada 111 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Lada 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lada 111 (76 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lada 111 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lada 111 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lada 111 (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 Lada 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 2010 Lada 111 | |
Make | Renault | Lada |
Model | Clio | 111 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 76 HP |
Torque | 114 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.8 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 71 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.1 seconds | 14 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 43 L |