1998 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Clio (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Clio | Clio |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 15 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |