1998 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Hyundai ix20
To start off, 2011 Hyundai ix20 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Hyundai ix20 (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Hyundai ix20 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Hyundai ix20 weights approximately 388 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Hyundai ix20 (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2011 Hyundai ix20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 2011 Hyundai ix20 | |
Make | Renault | Hyundai |
Model | Clio | ix20 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1783 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 17:01 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1268 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2615 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 5.6 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.8 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |