1998 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2011 Toyota Avalon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Avalon weights approximately 685 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Clio | 2011 Toyota Avalon | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Clio | Avalon |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5019 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1486 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2819 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |
