1998 Renault Clio vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 415 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 900 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (625 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 494 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Renault Clio | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Renault | Jaguar |
Model | Clio | XJ |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 93 mm |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 4.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 16.9 L/100km |