1998 Renault Espider vs. 1986 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1998 Renault Espider is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Holden Commodore (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1998 Renault Espider. (191 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Espider.
Because 1986 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Espider, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Holden Commodore (296 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Espider. (277 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Espider.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Espider | 1986 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Renault | Holden |
| Model | Espider | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 2962 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 277 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
