1998 Renault Safrane vs. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1998 Renault Safrane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 535 kg more than 1998 Renault Safrane.
Because 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Renault Safrane | 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Renault | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Safrane | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2188 cc | 6748 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 107 L |
