1998 Rover 200 vs. 1964 Trabant Universal

To start off, 1998 Rover 200 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1964 Trabant Universal. (23 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1964 Trabant Universal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 200 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1964 Trabant Universal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 200 (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Trabant Universal. (51 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1998 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Trabant Universal.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Rover 200 1964 Trabant Universal
Make Rover Trabant
Model 200 Universal
Year Released 1998 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1396 cc 595 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 102 HP 23 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3900 RPM
Torque 128 Nm 51 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 2750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1075 kg 660 kg
Vehicle Length 4230 mm 3370 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2030 mm