1998 Rover 200 vs. 1980 TVR 3000
To start off, 1998 Rover 200 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 200 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1980 TVR 3000.
Because 1980 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover 200 | 1980 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Rover | TVR |
Model | 200 | 3000 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2290 mm |