1998 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford S-Max (202 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1998 Rover 200. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford S-Max has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1998 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford S-Max will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover 200 | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Rover | Ford |
Model | 200 | S-Max |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |