1998 Rover 200 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (102 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 200 (127 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover 200 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Micra |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2449 mm |