1998 Rover 200 vs. 2011 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2011 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 200 (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover 200 | 2011 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Rover | Proton |
| Model | 200 | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |
