1998 Rover 200 vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (102 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover 200 | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Rover | Aston Martin |
| Model | 200 | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
