1998 Rover 400 vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1998 Rover 400 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60.
Because 1948 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover 400 | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | 400 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2850 mm |