1998 Rover 400 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover 400 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Rover | Ford |
| Model | 400 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1394 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2490 mm |
