1998 Rover 400 vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400. 2012 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover 400 has manual transmission. 1998 Rover 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover 400 | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Rover | Mazda |
| Model | 400 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2875 mm |
