1998 Rover 420 vs. 1963 Rover P5

To start off, 1998 Rover 420 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover P5 (119 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover P5 weights approximately 531 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Rover P5 (218 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 1963 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420.

Compare all specifications: