1998 Rover 420 vs. 1980 Triumph TR7
To start off, 1998 Rover 420 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Triumph TR7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Triumph TR7 would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Triumph TR7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Triumph TR7 (136 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Triumph TR7 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 420 weights approximately 29 kg more than 1980 Triumph TR7.
Because 1980 Triumph TR7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Triumph TR7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Triumph TR7 (236 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 1980 Triumph TR7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover 420 | 1980 Triumph TR7 | |
| Make | Rover | Triumph |
| Model | 420 | TR7 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1992 cc | 3528 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1189 kg | 1160 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2170 mm |
