1998 Rover 420 vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 276 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (340 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover 420 | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Rover | Volvo |
| Model | 420 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1992 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1189 kg | 1465 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |
