1998 Rover 420 vs. 2011 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 1013 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Koenigsegg Agera weights approximately 101 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Koenigsegg Agera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover 420 | 2011 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | Rover | Koenigsegg |
Model | 420 | Agera |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 1100 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1189 kg | 1290 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |