1998 Rover 600 vs. 1996 Toyota Chaser
To start off, 1998 Rover 600 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Chaser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Chaser would be higher. At 2,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Chaser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Chaser weights approximately 145 kg more than 1998 Rover 600.
Because 1996 Toyota Chaser is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Toyota Chaser. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover 600 | 1996 Toyota Chaser | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 600 | Chaser |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1848 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
