1998 Rover 600 vs. 2012 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2012 Toyota Camry is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 600 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Camry (200 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1998 Rover 600. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Camry weights approximately 295 kg more than 1998 Rover 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover 600 | 2012 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 600 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1848 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4806 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |
