1998 Rover 75 vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1998 Rover 75 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1976 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 75 (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1998 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover 75 | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 75 | Mark II |
Year Released | 1998 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1950 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2590 mm |