1998 Rover 75 vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 820 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover 75 | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 75 | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |