1998 Rover 75 vs. 2010 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2010 Toyota Aygo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (178 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Aygo. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 560 kg more than 2010 Toyota Aygo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Aygo. (93 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Aygo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover 75 | 2010 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 75 | Aygo |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.8 seconds | 14.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 35 L |