1998 Rover Mini vs. 1968 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover Mini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover Mini (62 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Corolla. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 4 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini.
Because 1968 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover Mini (94 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota Corolla. (77 Nm). This means 1998 Rover Mini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover Mini | 1968 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | Mini | Corolla |
Year Released | 1998 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1077 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 77 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 700 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2290 mm |