1998 Rover Mini vs. 1995 Xedos 6
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Xedos 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Xedos 6 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Xedos 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Xedos 6 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Xedos 6 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Xedos 6 weights approximately 444 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Xedos 6 (138 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1995 Xedos 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover Mini | 1995 Xedos 6 | |
| Make | Rover | Xedos |
| Model | Mini | 6 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1140 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |
