1998 Rover Mini vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover Mini has manual transmission. 1998 Rover Mini will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover Mini | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Rover | Acura |
Model | Mini | TL |
Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2840 mm |